Which of the following is a characteristic of strict liability?

Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds a party responsible for their actions or products without the need for the injured party to prove fault or intent. This means that even if the party exercised reasonable care and did not intend to cause harm, they can still be held liable for damages resulting from their actions.

The characteristic that liability is imposed regardless of intent is a core feature of strict liability. It applies in scenarios such as product liability cases, where a manufacturer could be liable for injuries caused by a defective product, irrespective of whether they acted negligently or intended to cause harm. This principle places the burden of responsibility on the manufacturer or party involved, rather than the injured party needing to prove negligence or intent.

The other options do not align with the principles of strict liability. For instance, establishing fault is not required in strict liability cases, and mitigating actions cannot eliminate liability since the focus is on the activity or product itself, not the intent or care taken by the defendant. Furthermore, strict liability can be applicable to various types of harm, not exclusively physical harm, thus allowing for broader application in legal contexts.